Introduction to Automata Theory

Author

Your Name

Published

February 5, 2025

Introduction

This lecture introduces the concept of automata, which are finite devices capable of recognizing infinite sets. Automata are fundamental building blocks in theoretical computer science, closely related to logic and various formalisms like temporal logic, first-order and second-order logic, regular expressions, and semigroups. These formalisms are different ways to express computations, which we will refer to as “words” in this context. The relationship between these formalisms can be visualized as follows:

Main Focus: Finite automata over finite words.

Finite refers to:

  • The number of states in the automata.

  • The length of the words they process.

Application in Verification: We will explore how these automata can be used in verification by treating:

  • Words as computations.

  • Sets of words as sets of computations.

Extensions (to be explored in subsequent lectures):

  • Finite automata can be extended to infinite words and trees.

  • These extensions correspond to different temporal logics:

    • Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) for infinite words.

    • Computation Tree Logic (CTL) for trees.

Textbook: The concepts discussed in this lecture are based on the textbook Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation by Hopcroft, Motwani, and Ullman.

Background on Finite Automata over Finite Words

Basic Definitions

We begin with the primitive notion of a symbol, which we denote with lowercase letters such as \(a, b, c\), etc.

A finite word or finite string is a finite sequence of symbols. We denote finite words with letters like \(u, v, w\), etc.

\(abba\) is a finite word.

The length of a word \(v\), denoted as \(|v|\), is the number of symbols in \(v\).

The length of the word \(abba\) is 4, i.e., \(|abba| = 4\).

The empty word, denoted by \(\epsilon\), is the word whose length is zero.

Application to Verification: An Example

Consider a scenario in an operating system where processes need access to shared resources. We can model this using a word where each letter represents an event:

  • \(a\): Request for access to a shared resource.

  • \(b\): Grant of access to the shared resource.

  • \(c\): Another operation (unspecified).

Let’s take the word \(w = abacaacccb\).

Property: We want to verify that every request (\(a\)) is eventually followed by a grant (\(b\)).

Visualization:

In the word \(w\), we can see instances where a request (\(a\)) is followed by a grant (\(b\)):

  • \(a\) (request) at position 1 is followed by \(b\) (grant) at position
  • \(a\) (request) at position 3 is followed by \(b\) (grant) at position
  • \(a\) (request) at position 4 is followed by \(b\) (grant) at position

This example demonstrates how words can model sequences of events in a system, and how automata can be used to verify properties of these sequences.

Operations on Words

The concatenation of two words \(u\) and \(v\), denoted as \(u \cdot v\) (or simply \(uv\)), is defined as their juxtaposition.

If \(u = ab\) and \(v = ccab\), then \(u \cdot v = abccab\).

Let \(A\) and \(B\) be two sets of words. The concatenation of \(A\) and \(B\), denoted as \(A \cdot B\), is defined as the set of all words \(uv\) such that \(u \in A\) and \(v \in B\).

If \(A = \{ab, b\}\) and \(B = \{c, ca\}\), then \(A \cdot B = \{abc, abca, bc, bca\}\).

Kleene Closure

For a set of words \(A\) and any natural number \(n \geq 0\), we define \(A^n\) recursively as follows:

  • \(A^0 = \{\epsilon\}\)

  • \(A^n = A^{n-1} \cdot A\) for \(n > 0\)

The Kleene closure of a set of words \(A\), denoted as \(A^*\), is defined as the infinite union:

If \(A = \{a\}\), then \(A^* = \{\epsilon, a, aa, aaa, \dots\}\).

The positive Kleene closure of a set of words \(A\), denoted as \(A^+\), is defined as:

Alphabet and Language

An alphabet is a finite set of symbols.

\(\Sigma = \{a, b, c\}\) is an alphabet.

A language over a finite alphabet is any set of finite words formed from the symbols of that alphabet.

\(L = \{a, aa, aaa, aba, aba, \dots\}\) is a language over the alphabet \(\{a, b\}\).

Conclusion

This lecture introduced the fundamental concepts of automata theory, focusing on finite automata over finite words. We defined key terms such as words, concatenation, and Kleene closure, and explored how these concepts relate to formal verification.

  • Words: Finite sequences of symbols representing computations.

  • Concatenation: Combining two words or sets of words by juxtaposition.

  • Kleene Closure: Generating an infinite set of words by repeatedly concatenating a set with itself, including the empty word.

  • Positive Kleene Closure: Similar to Kleene closure, but excluding the empty word.

  • Alphabet: A finite set of symbols.

  • Language: A set of finite words over a given alphabet.

  • Automata are finite devices that can recognize infinite sets of words.

  • Finite automata over finite words are a fundamental concept in theoretical computer science.

  • Words can be used to model computations in verification.

  • Kleene closure is a powerful operation for generating infinite sets of words from a finite set.

  • How can we formally define what it means for an automaton to “recognize” a language?

  • What are the limitations of finite automata, and how do other types of automata (e.g., Büchi automata) overcome these limitations?

  • How can the concepts introduced in this lecture be applied to practical problems in software and hardware verification?

The next lecture will delve deeper into the formal definition of finite automata and explore their properties and capabilities. We will also discuss the relationship between finite automata and regular expressions.